Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse of Central Texas

May 21, 2010

Some personal injury lawyers’ commitment to the proverb, “if at first you don’t succeed, try, try again,” is apparently paying off.  During the last legislative session, personal injury lawyers pushed a sweetheart deal that would have allowed them to bring asbestos lawsuits to court with virtually no proof of who caused an asbestos illness.  The shakedown asbestos bill was more of same for personal injury lawyers constantly looking for new ways to sue and to circumvent laws to keep junk science out of our courts.  Even though this bad bill (thankfully) died in the Texas House in 2009, the issue is up for discussion once again at a hearing before the House Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence Committee on May 26.

The idea of “no proof” asbestos lawsuits still stinks.  Allowing these types of lawsuits would undermine successful 2005 asbestos litigation reforms that are helping truly injured people receive swift and fair compensation and largely rid our courts of bogus asbestos cases based on junk science.  In the “bad old days,” inventive personal injury lawyers sponsored mobile screening vans and filed lawsuits for anyone who “tested positive” for asbestos illness.  Not surprisingly, nine out of 10 claims examined were based on “wrong” conclusions by the lawyers’ X-ray technicians, according to a Johns Hopkins University study.   A federal judge in Corpus Christ exposed further personal injury lawyer abuse when she tossed out more than 10,000 silicosis lawsuits explaining the bogus diagnoses had been “manufactured for money.” 

The “bad old days” of asbestos lawsuit abuse ended in 2005, when reforms established objective medical criteria and expedited the cases of the truly sick.  The reforms struck the proper balance of fairness by ensuring that sick people’s cases are heard first while preserving the rights of people who were exposed to asbestos but who are not sick to file their case later should they become ill.  The current law is working to keep junk science out of our courts and to provide efficient and generous compensation for the truly injured; typically between $1.4 million and $4 million per case. 

But now the legal abuses that once made Texas notorious are threatening a come-back.  Personal injury lawyers are still pushing to open the floodgates for yet another onslaught of asbestos cases based on flimsy – or even non-existent – evidence.  Previous personal injury lawyer-supported legislation set the level of proof so low that even incidental, brief exposure to a small amount of asbestos would be enough to find a business liable, regardless of whether the amount of exposure was enough to cause harm. 

Just as reforms from 2005 established medical criteria to determine which plaintiffs are actually ill, Texas must maintain standards to establish who is at fault for the illness.  Otherwise, essentially any business that ever had any product that contained any asbestos on the premises could be found liable for the illness – regardless if the amount was enough to cause harm.

People who have been injured deserve compensation and that requires actual, solid proof that a specific person or business caused the injury. A shakedown of peripheral players with little to no dealings with asbestos will only foster asbestos lawsuit abuse.  Many businesses – both big corporations and small businesses like auto repair shops– are at risk.  If such little evidence is needed to sue, businesses would be forced to settle regardless of liability because they can’t afford the cost of a lawsuit and the threat of unlimited damages.  Forced settlements and abusive lawsuits ultimately costs jobs by siphoning resources away from a company’s payroll.  Now is hardly the time to jeopardize more jobs. 

The personal injury lawyers’ motive to expand asbestos litigation is simple: Now that reforms have clamped down on junk science in asbestos lawsuits, personal injury lawyers are looking to expand the pot of money up for grabs by suing anyone, even if they’re not at a fault.  Lawyers may try and try again to find new ways to line their pockets but let’s hope Texas lawmakers ensure they don’t succeed on their watch.